When Ronald Reagan was elected president in 1980, he ushered in a conservative revolution in America. That revolution - based on Reagan's belief that less government and "free" markets would bring renewal and prosperity - has now had more than a generation to prove itself.
For 28 years, the conservative philosophy has been in the saddle, guiding American political thought and actions. The eight Clinton years were a mid-stream diversion, but even this period reflected the viewpoint of the Democratic Leadership Council, which is the conservative wing of the party. This conservative philosophy prized the concepts of less government, deregulation, balanced budgets, privatization of services, and general fiscal responsibility. Its adherents were convinced that this would maximize economic growth and enable America to maintain its dominant position in the world.
What have been the results? Let's look at just a few key indicators.
The national debt: In 1980, the debt was $1 trillion, which represented all the accumulated debt since the country was founded. Since 1980, the national debt has increased by 850 percent, to a total of $9.5 trillion. Of course, inflation accounts for part of this growth, but the majority is simple fiscal irresponsibility.
Deficit spending: During 24 of the last 28 years, a budget deficit was recorded. Only the last four years of the Clinton administration showed surpluses. The Bush administration has the highest cumulative deficit of any administration in history. Within the last few weeks, the White House announced that the fiscal 2009 budget deficit will be $490 billion, yet another record and a nice pass-along for the next president to deal with.
Per-capita income: In 1980, Americans had the highest per capita income in the world. Today we are in the middle of the pack compared with other industrialized countries. The bottom 80 percent of the population has seen a decline in income after taking inflation into account.
International trade: For the century leading up to the late 1970's, the US had a positive trade balance virtuallyevery year. Since then it has been a deficit, increasing with every passing year. We are now the world's greatest debtor nation, with dollars flooding the world due to unfavorable trade balances. One result has been the dramatic drop of the US dollar vis-à-vis most other major currencies.
Gross domestic product: In 1980, the US GDP was greater than the next four largest national economies combined. Now the US GDP is a little more than half as large as the next four combined. And China's economy, which was minimal in 1980, is now 75 percent as large as that of the US. Based on China's recent growth versus that of the US, the Chinese GDP could surpass that of the US within five years, a development incomprehensible in 1980. The United States has had the world's largest economy for approximately the last 125 years. This appears to be about to end.
The events of the past 28 years have done little to conserve American economic well being. Only those at the very top of the economic ladder have prospered enormously. The vast majority of Americans are struggling and are losing ground trying to maintain living standards comparable to their parent's generation. We've largely moved our manufacturing base overseas, especially to China. And the effects are to propel American wages downward, enrich a handful of corporate CEOs, and move China to the forefront of economic power and influence. To accomplish this "progress" we've taken on debt personally, corporately, and governmentally beyond all precedent.
Conservatism comes from the root word "conserve," meaning "to protect from loss or depletion."
So the question is, exactly what is it that has been conserved over the past 28 years?
Laurence Britt is a Rochester-area freelance writer.




Comments for "POLITICS: What have we gained from conservatism?" (2)
City Newspaper is not responsible for the content of these comments. City Newspaper reserves the right to remove comments at their discretion.
John said on Sep. 18, 2008 at 4:17pm
Laurence's ignorance is on full display in this article. First of all, I do agree with Laurence that the national debt is an indicator of fiscal mismanagement, but it does not allow one to make a judgment about conservative principles. I'm certain a liberal will not solve the problem of the budget crisis (as the current Democratic nominee has plans to increase government spending), but a true conservative who wishes to reduce the size of government. You should also mention that inflation accounts for approximately 50% of the national debt from 1980, meaning your "850 percent" is really closer to 400. Now let's talk about per capita income. Can you site your source, please, that we are in "the middle of the pack compared to other industrialized countries?" Also, your statistic that the "bottom 80% of the population" has seen a decline in income is practically meaningless. It says nothing about the middle class or the poor. As for GDP, Laurence, what do you suggest we do about the industrialization and modernization about countries that were formerly destitute? Do you suggest we go over to China and tell them to stop?! I thought Democrats were all about advancement, progress, and the betterment of those who are less well off? And by the way, China has nearly five times as many people as the United States, and its GDP is growing more quickly than the US GDP because it is still in the process of industrializing (although it won't come close to catching us in five years). Please, take a basic macroeconomics course before you make absurd judgments. Also, I'd like to hear what liberals plan to do jumpstart our economy. If your answer has anything to do with wealth redistribution or a tax on large corporations/"windfall profits," please, save it.
william said on Oct. 04, 2008 at 8:24pm
Thanks,
John's thinking is the same propaganda that got us into this mess. How can anyone go back in time and not see that path is not good.Conservatives have holes in their pockets and flawed thinking.Look at their history and the US debt.
Leave A Comment
Respond on Your Blog
Create an Account
or
Login
If you have a City Account you can not only post comments, but you can also respond to articles in your own City Blog. It's just another way to make your voice heard.