Rowe Photo

Back to News Articles

EDUCATION: Planning for after-school

Recommend Article
Total Recommendations (0)

A report recommending that the city and the Rochester school district collaborate to develop a joint after-school recreation program has been presented to City Council, Mayor Bob Duffy, and Superintendent Jean-Claude Brizard for review.

The report, put together by the Rochester Community Foundation and the nonprofit After-School Corporation, shows that after-school activities keep kids safe, help working families, and keep kids engaged in learning.

"They attend school because they look forward to the activities," says Caroline Jonah Merenda, a spokeswoman for the foundation.

City budget cuts eliminated most after-school recreation programs, but Duffy restored the funding when Brizard agreed to explore a joint effort. After-school recreation programs, which are city-funded and located in the schools, help provide oversight and activities for students between the hours of 3 to 6 p.m. It's a time when many parents of city students are not home.

The report recommends picking six pilot sites for a new program to launch in January 2009. The cost, shared by the city and the district, is estimated at $1,600 to $2,000 per student.

Brizard says that he and the mayor agree on adding a strong academic component to any new after-school program.

The school board would have to approve funding for the program. Board member Willa Powell, who has not seen the report, expressed concern about using district funds to provide child-care activities because that can widen the district's mission beyond academic achievement. The district already subsidizes at least one school-day meal to more than 70 percent of its students.

Comments for "EDUCATION: Planning for after-school " (3)

City Newspaper is not responsible for the content of these comments. City Newspaper reserves the right to remove comments at their discretion.

User Photo

Speedmaster said on Sep. 24, 2008 at 5:21pm

How about reading a book, a part-time job, volunteering, etc.? Note that none of these ideas require external funding. >> "... keep kids safe, help working families, and keep kids engaged in learning." How was this accomplished prior to say 1970?

User Photo

Speedmaster said on Sep. 29, 2008 at 1:48pm

>> "how about second graders going home after school to an empty house to take care of their kindergarten brothers and sisters?" So that justifies stealing from others (i.e. taxpayers) to fund more govt.? Very Machiavellian. Following this logic, why not take advantage of the fact that the heat and electricity will be wasted overnight? Students could stay around the clock, many already eat two taxpayer-supplied meals at school each day, why not a third? Where does it end? The welfare state needs to repealed. >> "These programs will also create more jobs." If that's the goal we can do it more cheaply by just paying people to dig ditches, then fill them.

User Photo

2ndgrade teacher said on Sep. 28, 2008 at 3:26pm

Reply to Speedmaster....how about second graders going home after school to an empty house to take care of their kindergarten brothers and sisters?

I think after school programs are a GREAT idea. Teachers stay after school and custodians stay to clean the building. That's a lot of heat and electricity that could be put to good use by schools that host after school programs. These programs will also create more jobs.

Leave A Comment

(This will not be published)

(Optional)

Respond on Your Blog

If you have a City Account you can not only post comments, but you can also respond to articles in your own City Blog. It's just another way to make your voice heard.