Back to News Articles

CRIME: Civil cases will target drug houses

Recommend Article
Total Recommendations (1)

Private citizens will be able to pursue civil cases against the owners of suspected drug houses under a new initiative conceived by City Council member Adam McFadden.

Rochester Street Watch is being piloted in the Thurston Road neighborhoods in the 19th Ward, where McFadden announced the initiative this morning.

Citizens who live within 200 feet of "disturbed" properties will be able to file lawsuits under the city's nuisance laws. They will be represented in civil court by volunteer attorneys. Two attorneys are on board now, McFadden says. He hopes to have eight.

A number of other people and agencies are involved in the effort, including property management experts, addiction rehabilitation services, and landlords and property owners.

Surveillance cameras installed around the city have pushed much of the drug activity indoors, McFadden says. The goal of the program, he says, is to basically hound the dealers to death, creating a neighborhood culture that rejects drug activity outright.

Police Chief David Moore attended the press conference and says that the program has the RPD's full support. The initiative will not interfere with or disrupt pending criminal investigations, McFadden says.

Punishments may include fines, eviction of tenants, and seizure of the property by the city, McFadden says.

Comments for "CRIME: Civil cases will target drug houses " (2)

City Newspaper is not responsible for the content of these comments. City Newspaper reserves the right to remove comments at their discretion.

User Photo

Andrew said on Oct. 05, 2009 at 5:10pm

Why not legalize marijuana on the federal level? Gangster criminal drug dealers will go out of business fast when they have to compete with packaged marijuana cigarettes from the likes of Marlboro and RJ Reynolds. Legalize it and tax it. Domestic marijuana could be a lucrative cash crap for the U.S. Prohibition and the "War of Drugs" have done nothing but bolster criminals gangs and syndicates.

This plan would both reduce organized crime and create a new sources of revenue for State governments, both from a direct tax on marijuana, as well as additional income tax revenue. Presently, the money which could be funding 1) domestic growers, 2) legal American businesses, and 3) government expenditures for schools, public safety, etc. is instead funding 1) local organized crime, 2) smugglers, and 3) foreign growers (which amounts to exportation of wealth).

User Photo

Pete said on Oct. 06, 2009 at 12:00pm

I agree, the real denial comes from our society through our drug laws. Prohibition does not work. Our government should be selling at government run stores all recreational drugs at below cost to put all drug dealers out of business. If there is no money to make locally, state wide, nationally, and international then they are out of business. The government can use drug enforcement monies for drug council ling on a everyday basis with people who are in need. Most of the public would not participate in the use of recreational drugs because of personal choice and drug policies at the workforce. If more people would understand and buy into this concept, a grassroots campaign could begin.

Leave A Comment

(This will not be published)

(Optional)

Respond on Your Blog

If you have a City Account you can not only post comments, but you can also respond to articles in your own City Blog. It's just another way to make your voice heard.