Geva Theatre
City Blogs: Entertainment Blog

July 17, 2008 at 8:44am

Musicals to movies: An irritating trend

Recommend Blog Post
Total Recommendations (0)

"No day but today!"

If I hear that phrase by one more mainstream I-only-like-"Rent"-because-I've-seen-the-movie poser, I am going to scream.

As a longtime musical theater enthusiast, I can say that the recent trend of Broadway musicals traveling to the big screen is bittersweet.

For one, I have to be fair and acknowledge that the exposure of musical theater to mainstream audiences does, in fact, elicit a wider appreciation for the genre, and therefore, is valuable to the theater community in general.

However, musical-movie watchers, know this: seeing the movie does not mean you know anything about the show. Or that you are entitled to say, "Like, oh my god, I looove ‘Hairspray!'"

When I do hear those proclamations, I need to work on the urge that bubbles up inside my fists.

"Chicago" was the first Broadway-to-Tinseltown movie I remember seeing. And you know what? I loved it.

But I had already seen it onstage. In New York. And owned the CD. I appreciated the theater art first, and cinematic art second.

A stream of musical movies followed its success: "Phantom of the Opera," "Rent," "Hairspray," the soon-to-hit-theaters "Mamma Mia," and many more.

You'd think the posing would be enough - but I have another complaint.

When musicals go to the main screen, they pull some big stars with them into the spotlight - big movie stars.

And the problem? What about those hard-working individuals who live paycheck-to-paycheck waiting tables to live out their passion for theater?

What about even those famous Broadway stars, such as Sutton Foster, who own the original Broadway casts of multiple productions and ultimately create their characters? (In Foster's case, "Thoroughly Modern Millie," "Little Women," and "The Drowsy Chaperone" all hung onto her for dear life.)

Whether a no-name actor trying to make it to the top, or a famous stage-star like Foster, why aren't these people getting the opportunity to trade up mediums to the screen?

I'm sorry, but Richard Gere in tap shoes and Emmy Rossum moving her lips to a computer-generated high note does not do musical theater justice.

"Rent" is, of course, an exception - and done extremely well, in my opinion. Most of the leads came straight from the original cast, including SOTA graduate Taye Diggs, Idina Menzel, Adam Paschal, Anthony Rapp, and Jesse L. Martin.

But it kills me when actors are taught how to sing for musical movies. That's why they have musical-theater performers - people who can act, sing, and dance, and do it in one shot, not 100!

Maybe my frustrations will go unheard. Or maybe, just maybe, movie producers will take a feather from the hat of "Rent" and cast real performers in musical theater roles.

Then again, Meryl Streep is playing the lead in "Mamma Mia."

Oh, well.         

Comments for "Musicals to movies: An irritating trend" (6)

City Newspaper is not responsible for the content of these reviews. City Newspaper reserves the right to remove reviews at their discretion.

User Photo

Tracy said on Jul. 17, 2008 at 7:36pm

Before you start getting all possessive-snobby over "Hairspray," please remember that it was a movie first, in 1988.

User Photo

Kara said on Jul. 18, 2008 at 8:58am

Recent trend? Musicals have been adapted for the silver screen since the days of Rogers and Hammerstein. As such a self-proclaimed musical scholar, I would think you'd be familiar with a few of those. But in the process of hoisting yourself up on to that terribly high horse, I could see where you might get distracted. And are we really getting snotty and territorial over a musical Frankenstein of ABBA songs? Calm down, rabid fan-girl.

User Photo

SOTA Graduate Taye Diggs said on Jul. 18, 2008 at 11:03am

I don't know if you guys have heard, but I'm from Rochester. Phillip Seymour Hoffman and I were just talking about this exact thing over some garbage plates, because we're from Rochester. And speaking as an actor who has done television, stage and screen, if you'll pay to see it, we'll keep doing it.

Love,

Rochester's own Taye Diggs, from SOTA.

User Photo

Phillip Seymour Hoffman, Beloved Rochester Native said on Jul. 21, 2008 at 8:23am

Way.

User Photo

jb said on Jul. 20, 2008 at 11:21am

Such BS... no way Taye Diggs commented...
"Phillip Seymour Hoffman and I were just talking about this exact thing over some garbage plates, because we're from Rochester"

Bull----Shhhhizzzzzzzzzzit

User Photo

Susan B. Anthony. said on Jul. 21, 2008 at 9:16pm

Full disclosure. Phillip Seymour Hoffman and Taye Diggs did not really post on this article. I am, however, the real Susan B. Anthony. Rent stunk, but I did enjoy Our Town.

Leave A Comment

(This will not be published)

(Optional)

Respond on Your Blog

If you have a City Account you can not only post comments, but you can also respond to articles in your own City Blog. It's just another way to make your voice heard.

Recent Comments

Bob said:

DJ, please give examples of funny moments. Could you build your case, and not resort to thinly...

about NBC Thursday: Aren't comedies supposed to be funny?

DJ said:

Oh...ok. I guess all the laughter I was hearing from my friends and I was just our imagination....

about NBC Thursday: Aren't comedies supposed to be funny?

Al said:

Kath and Kim was the most brutal thing I've ever seen. 2 minutes in I was ready to be done but I...

about NBC Thursday: Aren't comedies supposed to be funny?

Bob said:

DJ, you're wrong. It's not funny. Period.

about NBC Thursday: Aren't comedies supposed to be funny?

DJ said:

You didn't get it. It is a totally different brand of comedy. Give it a little time and you may...

about NBC Thursday: Aren't comedies supposed to be funny?